PRINCIPLES OF LOGIC BY G.H. Joyce
Preface
I bought Principles
of Logic in a London bookshop in 1983 for £1, and turned out to be one of
my most valuable acquisitions. It is interesting for a number of reasons.
·
It is an example in the purest form
of a seminary manual of the traditional type, written in the modern age, yet
uncontaminated by any modernistic
prejudice.
·
It is a well-written and clearly
presented summary of traditional logic, from the neo-scholastic point of view.
·
It is researched in a scholarly way
and has many references to the Latin sources for medieval logic. Many of these (particularly Aristotle and Aquinas) are now available on
the Web.
·
It is a comprehensive guide to the
state of Logic before the modern theory became widespread. Joyce supplies many references to nineteenth
century sources on Logic, in English, French and German. Thought he never mentions (and doubtless
never heard of Frege), he discusses many authorities (such as Uberweg, Jevons
and Sigwart, whom we know or believe Frege had read).
·
It is essentially a historical
document. It was published in 1908, some
thirty years after the publication of Frege's revolutionary
Begriffschift, six years after Russell
discovered the famous contradiction
in Frege's system, and the very same year as Zermelo published a formalised
version of Cantor's set theory
in Peirce-Schroder notation. But
Joyce's summary of modern logic
does not mention these things at all. It
shows how our view of the past, which reflects our history of the past, may not
have been shared by those who were actually living in the past [N1].
The book was first published in 1908, by
Longmans. I have used material from the
third edition, published as late as 1949 (being the first four chapters, and
part of the seventh chapter).
I know little about its author, George Hayward
Joyce, except for his dates (1864-1943) and that his name appears on the Nihil Obstat of another neo-scholastic
work, as censor deputatus of the
diocese of Southwark. If anyone who has
further information about Joyce, would like to contact
me, I would be grateful.
[edit: 16 March 2013]. A link to this
obituary in the Catholic Herald, 19th November 1943, was sent to me by
a Logic Museum reader. "Eleven days after keeping the fiftieth
anniversary of his entrance into the Society of Jesus, Father George Hayward
Joyce died somewhat suddenly on Monday at Heythrop College". Joyce was a
convert to Catholicism, his father being vicar of Harrow-on-the-Hill. He was educated at Charterhouse then Oriel. He
was a novice of the Society of Jesus at Roehampton (probably at Manresa House
where Gerard Manley Hopkins also stayed). "He was ordained in 1903 and the
following year became Professor of Logic and Epistemology at St. Mary's Hall,
Stonyhurst, where he wrote, The Principles of Logic, his first book.
Later he was at Heythrop College, where he was Prefect of Studies and Dean of
the Faculty of Theology. (Many of the
texts in the Logic Museum were sourced from originals in the Heythrop
library).
Title Page and Author's Introduction
3. The Place of Logic in Philosophy
3. Adequate, Clear and Obscure Concepts
5. Categorematic and Syncategorematic Words
7. Singular,
General and Collective Terms
8. Abstract
and Concrete Terms
9. Connotative
and Non-Connotative Terms
10. Positive
and Negative Terms
11. Absolute
and Relative Terms
12. Terms of First and Second Intention
13. Univocal,
Equivocal and Analogous Terms
15. The
'Suppositio' of the Term
5. The Fourfold Scheme of Propositions
6. Analytic and Synthetic Propositions
8. Compound Categorical Propositions
10. Reduction of Propositions to Logical
Form
5. Other Views as to the Source of the Laws of Thought
1. Import
of Propositions - Predicative view
Footnotes
[N1] As
Austin acutely observed (in the introduction to his translation of the Grundlagen),
we tend to forget that Frege's inherited philosophical vocabulary is a dated
one. It is the same vocabulary that
which was rendered into English by his contemporaries, the "British
Idealists" (such as "idea" for Vorstellung and "proposition"
for Satz). Frege's thought cannot be
reproduced accurately, nor can his ideas be translated consistently, unless we
understand the philosophical language of his time.
The Logic Museum
Copyright © E.D.Buckner 2005, 2013.