Roma Vat. Lat. 1113
From The Logic Museum
Jump to navigationJump to search- 1r-185v: Anfredus Gonteri, O.F.M. f. 1325 Commentarius in librum I Sententiarum, a fratre MInore auditore et defensore Iohannis Duns Scoti sec. XIV
- 456r-458r: Campi, Bartolomeo, m. 1573 Riformatione della cittadella d'Anversa sec. XVI-XVII
Connection with Harclay's commentary
Duba et al 2010:
- Balic also understood that there was a close relationship between Harclay and Aufredo Gonteri Brito. In the prologue and first three distinctions of Book l, there is an indication that some material in Harclay's commentary found its way into that of Gonteri, for example a reference to Maimonides' Guide of the Perplexed in Harclay's dist. 3, qu. l, and in Gonteri's dist. 3, qu. 11. After the first fifteen questions, however-that is, starting with distinction 4-Gonteri begins incorporating most of Harclay's questions verbatim, so that of the remaining 64 questions in Harclay's commentary, we find that 57 are also extant in the manuscripts containing Gonteri's commentary on Book 1.
For Harclay's commentary, see Roma Vat. Lat. 13687
See also
References
- William O. Duba, Russell L. Friedman, and Chris Schabel “Henry of Harclay and Aufredo Gonteri Brito”, in Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, Brill 2010.
