Authors/Duns Scotus/Ordinatio/Ordinatio I/Prologus

First part: On the necessity of revealed doctrine

• Art. 1 Whether it was necessary for man in this present state that some doctrine be supernaturally inspired.
• Art. 2 Rejection of the opinion of the philosophers
• Art. 3 Solution of the question
• Art. 4 About the Three Principle Reasons against the Philosophers
• Art. 5 To the Arguments of the Philosophers

See also Lectura I Prologus Pars 1.

Second part: On the sufficiency of sacred scripture

• q. unica: Whether supernatural knowledge necessary for the wayfarer is sufficiently handed on in Sacred Scripture. (n95)

See also Lectura I Prologus Pars 1

Third part: on the object of theology

• qq. 1-3
  • Whether theology is about God as about its first object. (n124)
  • Whether theology is about God under some special idea. (n133)
  • Whether theology is about everything by way of attribution of them to its first subject. (n139)

See also Lectura I Prologus Pars 2 QQ. 1-3

Fourth part: theology as science

Whether theology is a science, and whether it is subordinated (to other sciences) or not.

• q. 1 et 2:Utrum theologia in se sit scientia, et utrum subalternans vel subalternata

See also Lectura I Prologus Pars 3 QQ. 1-2

Fifth part: whether theology is a practical or a speculative science

• QQ 1-2
  • Q1 Utrum theologia sit scientia practica vel speculativa (n208)
  • Q2 Utrum ex ordine ad praxim ut ad finem dicatur per se scientia practica (n223)

Vide Lectura I Prologus Pars 4 QQ. 1-2